If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Endoscopic full-thickness resection with retroperitoneal dissection for duodenal myogenic cyst with adjustable traction from an independently controlled snare
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, TaiwanDepartment of Medical Sciences Industry, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Kaohsiung Veteran General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, TaiwanObesity Center, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
Endoscopic full thickness resection with retroperitoneal dissection for duodenal myogenic cyst with adjustable traction from an independently controlled snare.
A 58-year-old man was coincidentally found to have a duodenal subepithelial lesion in the bulb. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a 20-mm anechoic lesion with suspicious echogenic content or a hypoechoic lesion from the muscular propria (Figs. 1 and 2; Video 1, available online at www.giejournal.org). Computed tomography revealed a lesion close to the hepatic hilum (Fig. 3). After a multidisciplinary discussion with endoscopists and surgeons, we decided to perform endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of the lesion with acceptable risk. Fine-needle aspiration or incisional biopsy was not performed because of the possibility of tissue scaring and difficulty in mucosal flap creation during EFTR. The surgical approach required dissection of the retroperitoneum at the hepatic hilum and peripancreatic area, which was a concern. Nevertheless, with the patient’s consent, we decided to perform diagnostic and curative EFTR.
Figure 1The tumor was located in the duodenal bulb.
The procedure was performed with the patient under general anesthesia with intubation. Positive pressure ventilation was used, and airway pressure was monitored to prevent lung collapse after possible pneumoperitoneum without any abdominal pressure sensor placement. The patient was positioned in the left lateral decubitus position. Prophylactic antibiotics including cefazolin (1 g) were administered before EFTR.
To facilitate EFTR, we used snare-based traction. The process of traction building was as follows: The dissection scope was removed, and an additional gastroscope was used to snare the lesion for traction (Captivator II 27-mm snare, 240 cm in length; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass). The traction gastroscope was retracted after placing the snare, and an assistant held the snare (Fig. 4). Then, the dissection scope could be advanced along the snare. We could apply bidirectional and adjustable traction by adjusting the pulling or pushing forces on the snare. The snare could also be released and placed at a different area if required.
Figure 4The view of the snare traction outside of the patient.
We first dissected and exposed the tumor. Thereafter, we started EFTR via the submucosal injection of normal saline without any dye; no mucosal marking was done. We incised the oral site mucosa with DualKnife J (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) to create a mucosal flap for further wound closure. Snare-based traction was applied to the mucosa for better submucosal dissection and tumor exposure. Submucosal injection was performed as needed using DualKnife J. We located the tumor by touching the mucosa and muscle layer with DualKnife J. The tumor was gradually exposed.
We then dissected the tumor from the muscle and entered the retroperitoneum using ITknife nano (Olympus). No injection was performed in the muscle layer and retroperitoneum. After dissection, most of the tumor dropped into the extraluminal space. Traction was shifted to the tumor by releasing the snare, removing the dissection scope, inserting the traction gastroscope, snaring the tumor again, and withdrawing the traction gastroscope. After advancing the dissection scope, we carefully dissected the tumor from the extraluminal fat while applying traction (Video 1, Figs. 5 and 6). We applied the desirable traction force by pushing or pulling the snare (Video 1). After removing the lesion, the wound was closed with hemostatic clips (Figs. 7 and 8).
Figure 5View from the endoscopic submucosal dissection scope: the snare from the traction scope grasped the tumor, which dropped into the retroperitoneum.
The patient resumed a normal diet 2 days after EFTR and was discharged 5 days after the procedure. Antibiotics, including cefuroxime, were prescribed for a week. The patient’s postprocedural course was uneventful, with no adverse events. Pathological analysis confirmed a duplication cyst.
Duodenal EFTR is technically challenging and risky because of limited maneuverability and delayed adverse events.
Our findings suggest the feasibility of EFTR with snare-based traction for duodenal myogenic lesions. The technique offers strong traction for grasping more tissue, allows the application of pulling and minimal pushing forces, and enables changing the traction areas as required.
Disclosure
The authors disclosed no financial relationships.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish these images.
Endoscopic full thickness resection with retroperitoneal dissection for duodenal myogenic cyst with adjustable traction from an independently controlled snare.
References
Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E.
Queneherve L.
Margos W.
et al.
ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.